What's this Web 2.0 stuff anyway?
The term itself was first coined at a conference brainstorming session between Tim O'Reilly and MediaLive International, which also spawned the Web 2.0 Conference (second annual, held earlier this month). Consequently, the best explanation I could find was on O'Reilly's website. Some suggest it's just a marketing buzzword (and I know it's regularly misused that way) but it is much more important, and all about viewing the web as an applications platform.
One of the shorthand ways to describe what it's all about comes from this extract from his article:
Tim's article goes on to explain that the characteristics of Web 2.0 companies include offering scalable services rather than packaged software. Their approach will harness collective intelligence in some way - from blogging to the Open Source Software model. They will use some form of customer self service model, and adopt a very different, "lighter" business model compared to traditional software vendors. It's all very exciting. Read more here."In our initial brainstorming, we formulated our sense of Web 2.0 by example:
Web 1.0 --> Web 2.0
DoubleClick --> Google AdSense
Ofoto --> Flickr
Akamai --> BitTorrent
mp3.com --> Napster
Britannica Online --> Wikipedia
personal websites --> blogging
evite --> upcoming.org and EVDB
domain name speculation --> search engine optimization
page views --> cost per click
screen scraping --> web services
publishing --> participation
content management systems --> wikis
directories (taxonomy) --> tagging ("folksonomy")
stickiness --> syndication
The list went on and on. But what was it that made us identify one application or approach as "Web 1.0" and another as "Web 2.0"?"
I did, however, have to look up some of the jargon and buzzwords in the article - folksonomy for example. See the Bullfighter, elsewhere on this site!
0 Comments:
Post a Comment
<< Home